What is the best way of taking care of error handling in Rapise? Are there any general examples? en-US(C) Copyright 2006-2026 Inflectra Corporation.support@inflectra.com/Computers/Software/Project_Management//Computers/Software/Quality_Assurance/KronoDesksupport@inflectra.comhttp://www.inflectra.com/kronodesk/forums/threads120/Support/Forum/rapise/best-practices/398.aspxthreadId=398Jenny Davidsson (jenny.davidsson@ascom.se) What is the best way of taking care of error handling in Rapise? Are there any general examples? Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:41:34 -04002026-04-21T05:19:12-04:00/Support/Forum/rapise/best-practices/398.aspxmessageId=753David J (adam.sandman+support@inflectra.com) Hi Jenny In general you just use the Javascript try { .... } catch (ex) structures. http://www.w3schools.com/js/js_try_catch.asp Regards Adam Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:13:14 -04002012-10-17T17:13:14-04:00/Support/Forum/rapise/best-practices/398.aspx#reply753messageId=7610Emma Martin (emmamartin2133219@gmail.com) In Rapise, the most effective way to handle errors is to combine structured checks with proper logging and recovery logic rather than relying only on global error catching. A common approach is: Use Tester.Assert() or Verifier statements to validate expected states Wrap risky steps in trycatch blocks so the script doesnt stop completely on failure Add conditional checks (e.g., element exists/visible) before interacting with objects Log meaningful messages using Tester.Message() to help with debugging For reusable flows, create helper functions that include built-in error handling A simple pattern many teams use is: try action verify result log failure optionally continue or stop based on severity. Also, when sharing test run recordings or demos of error handling flows, tools like capcut no watermark are often used to clean up videos so the focus stays on the actual test behavior Tue, 21 Apr 2026 05:19:12 -04002026-04-21T05:19:12-04:00/Support/Forum/rapise/best-practices/398.aspx#reply7610