<rss version="2.0" xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Inflectra Customer Forums: Requirement Status (Thread)</title><description> Hi there,  Is there any way I can change or custom the requirement status and workflow? I can change the workflow but cannot touch the predefined status of the requirements (Requested, Completed etc...). I want to change to something like Draft but couldnt see that in the template  Thanks, </description><language>en-US</language><copyright>(C) Copyright 2006-2026 Inflectra Corporation.</copyright><managingEditor>support@inflectra.com</managingEditor><category domain="http://www.dmoz.org">/Computers/Software/Project_Management/</category><category domain="http://www.dmoz.org">/Computers/Software/Quality_Assurance/</category><generator>KronoDesk</generator><a10:contributor><a10:email>support@inflectra.com</a10:email></a10:contributor><a10:id>http://www.inflectra.com/kronodesk/forums/threads</a10:id><ttl>120</ttl><link>/Support/Forum/spiraplan/issues-questions/2467.aspx</link><item><guid isPermaLink="false">threadId=2467</guid><author>Tung Nguyen (tran.nguyen@transport.nsw.gov.au)</author><title>Requirement Status</title><description> Hi there,  Is there any way I can change or custom the requirement status and workflow? I can change the workflow but cannot touch the predefined status of the requirements (Requested, Completed etc...). I want to change to something like Draft but couldnt see that in the template  Thanks, </description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 04:06:24 -0400</pubDate><a10:updated>2021-09-22T11:07:56-04:00</a10:updated><link>/Support/Forum/spiraplan/issues-questions/2467.aspx</link></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">messageId=4080</guid><author>Ilia Poliakov (ilya.polyakov@edetek.com)</author><title> Yep, cutomization of workflows:   Custom status names everywhere adding more/deleting existing,  Cu</title><description> Yep, cutomization of workflows:   Custom status names everywhere adding more/deleting existing,  Custom order in filter drop-down on the list view  Custom order on the Board   is also needed for our company. </description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:34:54 -0400</pubDate><a10:updated>2021-08-23T08:34:54-04:00</a10:updated><link>/Support/Forum/spiraplan/issues-questions/2467.aspx#reply4080</link></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">messageId=4087</guid><author>David J (adam.sandman+support@inflectra.com)</author><title> There are some reasons we dont allow requirement and test case statuses to be edited at present.  I</title><description> There are some reasons we dont allow requirement and test case statuses to be edited at present.  It is due to the automation available where changes to test case and task statuses automatically affect the requirements they are associated with. If we allow you to fully change the statuses, that automation will break. </description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:39:06 -0400</pubDate><a10:updated>2021-08-23T11:39:06-04:00</a10:updated><link>/Support/Forum/spiraplan/issues-questions/2467.aspx#reply4087</link></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">messageId=4089</guid><author>Ilia Poliakov (ilya.polyakov@edetek.com)</author><title> David, thank you for your answer.  If you ask us between choosing automation and having custom name</title><description> David, thank you for your answer.  If you ask us between choosing automation and having custom names of the requirements statuses, we choose having custom statuses (we have already switched automation of as all automatization is not really compliant: if a task was started, the requirement jumpes to In Progress status with passing obligatory status Accepted, where it should be signed by PO ). So, anyway automation should be rewritten.  According to many threads in defferent Inflectra forums, I may expect that others vote for the same. </description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:53:48 -0400</pubDate><a10:updated>2021-08-23T12:53:48-04:00</a10:updated><link>/Support/Forum/spiraplan/issues-questions/2467.aspx#reply4089</link></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">messageId=4132</guid><author>Barbara Bernardin (bbernardin@pkwillis.com)</author><title> I would definitely rather have the ability to customize the status and workflow rather than the aut</title><description> I would definitely rather have the ability to customize the status and workflow rather than the automation, which we have also turned off.  Ive tried using the statuses to mean things that make sense in our environment, but then they dont display on the planning boards correctly.  Very frustrating. </description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 22:03:41 -0400</pubDate><a10:updated>2021-09-16T22:03:41-04:00</a10:updated><link>/Support/Forum/spiraplan/issues-questions/2467.aspx#reply4132</link></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">messageId=4137</guid><author>Ilia Poliakov (ilya.polyakov@edetek.com)</author><title>   David  , see please an answer from  bbernardin ( whom I dont know by the way). He has the same vi</title><description>   David  , see please an answer from  bbernardin ( whom I dont know by the way). He has the same views what is more important for Spira. We dont need automation but custom statses it is what is expected from all forums here. Look through different topics and forums. </description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:41:35 -0400</pubDate><a10:updated>2021-09-17T14:41:35-04:00</a10:updated><link>/Support/Forum/spiraplan/issues-questions/2467.aspx#reply4137</link></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">messageId=4141</guid><author>admin computacenter (spiratest.request@computacenter.com)</author><title> When you say automation would break do you mean the Requirements workflow? </title><description> When you say automation would break do you mean the Requirements workflow? </description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 10:13:31 -0400</pubDate><a10:updated>2021-09-22T10:13:31-04:00</a10:updated><link>/Support/Forum/spiraplan/issues-questions/2467.aspx#reply4141</link></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">messageId=4142</guid><author>admin computacenter (spiratest.request@computacenter.com)</author><title> I was thinking about adding in a new requirement status directly into the database ( which would be</title><description> I was thinking about adding in a new requirement status directly into the database ( which would be outside of the requirements workflow) but would not want to risk impacting the existing requirements workflow) </description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:07:56 -0400</pubDate><a10:updated>2021-09-22T11:07:56-04:00</a10:updated><link>/Support/Forum/spiraplan/issues-questions/2467.aspx#reply4142</link></item></channel></rss>