<rss version="2.0" xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Inflectra Customer Forums: Best approach for accurately reflecting bandwidth on the Planning Board (Thread)</title><description>&#xD;
What is the best approach to have the Planning Board accurately reflecting the available bandwidth? For instance we have individuals that maybe are only available for 50% of a Sprint or may not partake at all in a Sprint yet the Planning Board and everywhere else it projects available bandwidth assumes everyone is available? I would like to say Person 1, Person 2, are out for this Sprint and thus are not visible on the Planning Board.&#xD;
&#xD;
</description><language>en-US</language><copyright>(C) Copyright 2006-2026 Inflectra Corporation.</copyright><managingEditor>support@inflectra.com</managingEditor><category domain="http://www.dmoz.org">/Computers/Software/Project_Management/</category><category domain="http://www.dmoz.org">/Computers/Software/Quality_Assurance/</category><generator>KronoDesk</generator><a10:contributor><a10:email>support@inflectra.com</a10:email></a10:contributor><a10:id>http://www.inflectra.com/kronodesk/forums/threads</a10:id><ttl>120</ttl><link>/Support/Forum/spirateam/best-practices/675.aspx</link><item><guid isPermaLink="false">threadId=675</guid><author>Aaron McIver (amciver@scfaz.com)</author><title>Best approach for accurately reflecting bandwidth on the Planning Board</title><description>&#xD;
What is the best approach to have the Planning Board accurately reflecting the available bandwidth? For instance we have individuals that maybe are only available for 50% of a Sprint or may not partake at all in a Sprint yet the Planning Board and everywhere else it projects available bandwidth assumes everyone is available? I would like to say Person 1, Person 2, are out for this Sprint and thus are not visible on the Planning Board.&#xD;
&#xD;
</description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:39:41 -0400</pubDate><a10:updated>2013-08-19T13:19:18-04:00</a10:updated><link>/Support/Forum/spirateam/best-practices/675.aspx</link></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">messageId=1237</guid><author>David J (adam.sandman+support@inflectra.com)</author><title> &#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
Hi Aaron  To handle partially allocated resources, you would need to adjust the non-working d</title><description> &#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
Hi Aaron  To handle partially allocated resources, you would need to adjust the non-working days in the Release / Iteration to reduce the amount of available time to account for the partial resources. In the future we plan on adding support for partial allocations.  Regards  Adam </description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:19:18 -0400</pubDate><a10:updated>2013-08-19T13:19:18-04:00</a10:updated><link>/Support/Forum/spirateam/best-practices/675.aspx#reply1237</link></item></channel></rss>