Hello, We have steps within a few Test Cases that are dependent on another User/Testers completing a step before the next step can be actioned. For example, Step 3 is Finance Manager approves Purchase Requisition and Step 4 is Finance Officer receives a notification that Finance Manager has approved the Purchase Requisition and a P/O has been generated. Is there a way to assign specific Steps within a Test Case to different Testers? Or, is there a way to assign Test Cases within a Test et to multiple Testers? Many thanks Nicole en-US(C) Copyright 2006-2026 Inflectra Corporation.support@inflectra.com/Computers/Software/Project_Management//Computers/Software/Quality_Assurance/KronoDesksupport@inflectra.comhttp://www.inflectra.com/kronodesk/forums/threads120/Support/Forum/spirateam/issues-questions/2523.aspxthreadId=2523Nicole McCaughey (nicole.mccaughey@venueswest.wa.gov.au) Hello, We have steps within a few Test Cases that are dependent on another User/Testers completing a step before the next step can be actioned. For example, Step 3 is Finance Manager approves Purchase Requisition and Step 4 is Finance Officer receives a notification that Finance Manager has approved the Purchase Requisition and a P/O has been generated. Is there a way to assign specific Steps within a Test Case to different Testers? Or, is there a way to assign Test Cases within a Test et to multiple Testers? Many thanks Nicole Fri, 29 Oct 2021 06:54:11 -04002023-02-17T05:01:23-05:00/Support/Forum/spirateam/issues-questions/2523.aspxmessageId=4165David J (adam.sandman+support@inflectra.com) Hi Nicole Yes, you can assign separate Owners to each test case in a test set (for this very purpose). Regards David Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:23:08 -04002021-10-29T10:23:08-04:00/Support/Forum/spirateam/issues-questions/2523.aspx#reply4165messageId=5873Heath Bentley (H.Bentley@cairns.qld.gov.au) Hi Nicole, I have the exact same situation where test cases have steps in them that need to be run by different areas of the business. There are a few solutions, including the one made by David, however, this means splitting existing test cases up into smaller test cases, putting them in order into a Test Set (Not impossible but has drawbacks). This is a lot of work plus I can see you would end up with test cases that as individuals, dont make sense and you lose the full context of what the Test is intended for. Alternative Solution: Testers use the Pause test case and Pending Test Case functions: How it would work: 1.The 1st tester runs the test case, complete their first 3 steps, then they Pause it - this puts the Test Case in the Pending list for that tester. Also when you pause a Test case the results so far do NOT show in the main test case screen. (Note: There is function that will both put a partially run test case in the Pending list AND also show a result on the main test case screen, let me know if you want more info on this) 2.The tester then goes into their Pending test run queue and reassigns the test case to the next tester 3. The test case then appears in the next testers Pending test case queue and they can Resume the test run and put their results in. I havent tried this yet, but my Procurement and Account Payable areas here are going to trial this and see if it will work for us. I believe it depends on the skills of your testers as they have to learn to: Use the Pause function - (Note: this is easy, a one button push) Going to the Pending test case queue and reassign test cases from the Pending queue to the next tester Be able to resume a test case from the Pending queue when they receive None of these are difficult once youve done it a few times Let me know what you think Cheers Heath Fri, 17 Feb 2023 05:01:23 -05002023-02-17T05:01:23-05:00/Support/Forum/spirateam/issues-questions/2523.aspx#reply5873