Inflectra Customer Forums: Custom requirement's statuses, board order and custom link types (Thread) Hello, I am sure that different companies have different processes , so statuses of requirements should be cutomizable (as it is done for incdents in Spira). Like we may have a wish to have status Estimated, another company may have a wish my company best status and etc. How is it possible to add a status that is only for particular Spira installation? We do not use status synchronization between tasks and requirements. Related question is about status order on a Board. As it is not customizable we can not use Spira Requirements Board view (we would like to have earlier statuses at the left of the board as it is a well-known best practice, but in our methodology status Design in Proccess is earlier than Ready for Test while on the board it is shown opposite). Similar sitation is with association types. It is normal to expect an ability to add our own association types in addition to these two that are out of the box: related to, depends on. en-US(C) Copyright 2006-2024 Inflectra Corporation.support@inflectra.com/Computers/Software/Project_Management//Computers/Software/Quality_Assurance/KronoDesksupport@inflectra.comhttp://www.inflectra.com/kronodesk/forums/threads120/Support/Forum/spirateam/issues-questions/2411.aspxthreadId=2411Ilia Poliakov (ilya.polyakov@edetek.com)custom statuses cusom link types board orderCustom requirement's statuses, board order and custom link types Hello, I am sure that different companies have different processes , so statuses of requirements should be cutomizable (as it is done for incdents in Spira). Like we may have a wish to have status Estimated, another company may have a wish my company best status and etc. How is it possible to add a status that is only for particular Spira installation? We do not use status synchronization between tasks and requirements. Related question is about status order on a Board. As it is not customizable we can not use Spira Requirements Board view (we would like to have earlier statuses at the left of the board as it is a well-known best practice, but in our methodology status Design in Proccess is earlier than Ready for Test while on the board it is shown opposite). Similar sitation is with association types. It is normal to expect an ability to add our own association types in addition to these two that are out of the box: related to, depends on. Mon, 12 Jul 2021 07:25:35 -04002022-01-19T08:19:03-05:00/Support/Forum/spirateam/issues-questions/2411.aspxmessageId=3996David J (support1@inflectra.com) Thanks for the feedback. We are planning on making some near term changes to requirement statuses a Thanks for the feedback. We are planning on making some near term changes to requirement statuses and boards: Although we wont be allowing full customization of statuses in the near term, we will be allowing you to specify the order so the flow on the boards make sense. Were looking at making some other usability enhancements specifically to the boards Regarding Association types, the current plan is to enable several more built-in types that will let us be able to make the Gantt charts more automated with better dependency tracking. Ive passed on your feedback for having customizable types. Tue, 13 Jul 2021 01:04:56 -04002021-07-13T01:04:56-04:00/Support/Forum/spirateam/issues-questions/2411.aspx#reply3996messageId=4247Ilia Poliakov (ilya.polyakov@edetek.com) Are there any news when it is going to be implemented? Are there any news when it is going to be implemented? Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:19:03 -05002022-01-19T08:19:03-05:00/Support/Forum/spirateam/issues-questions/2411.aspx#reply4247