Compare SpiraTest & PractiTest: Which is Better in 2025?

Key Takeaways of SpiraTest vs. PractiTest:

Different Focuses With AI: SpiraTest and Inflectra.ai emphasize generative workflows like creating test cases from requirements. PractiTest’s implementation of AI prioritizes and de-duplicates documentation and artifacts. Your choice will depend on whether your preference is for help creating tests or optimizing which ones to run.

Reporting Depth vs. Public Visibility: SpiraTest has deeper BI capabilities, especially at scale. However, PractiTest allows dashboards to be shared publicly for broader visibility without extra accounts. There are benefits to both approaches, but which you give more weight to will likely influence your decision.

Scalability: SpiraTest’s upgrade path via SpiraTeam and SpiraPlan provides more comprehensive scalability to areas like portfolio/program management and risk/strategy. This keeps you in one ecosystem without having to learn new interfaces or pay for new licensing structures.

Data Governance: For teams operating under GDPR or regional mandates, Spira’s region selection and on-premise deployment option provide additional control and sovereignty. While PractiTest’s cloud architecture can be convenient, it doesn’t offer the same safeguards.

Integrations: PractiTest offers more integrations than SpiraTest, from CI/CD tools and big trackers to automation frameworks. This can be beneficial for teams already using a diverse set of systems, but it also means PractiTest relies on external tools for key capabilities more than SpiraTest.

SpiraTest vs. PractiTest: Platforms Overview & Summary

Factor	SpiraTest	PractiTest
Test Case Management	Advanced features for workflows, parameterization, and reusable/linked steps.	Solid centralized library with reusable steps, but limited modular linking.
Requirements Management	Built-in module with traceability to tests and releases.	Supports end-to-end traceability with strong customization and hierarchical filters.
Traceability	End-to-end traceability with internal linking across artifacts, and AI can draft tests from requirements.	End-to-end traceability via integrations and AI helps prioritize suites.
Automation	Deep, native Rapise integration and broad framework support.	xBot orchestrates many frameworks, but no native, full automation tool.
Exploratory Testing	Native mode plus SpiraCapture for session capture and defect logging.	Dedicated module, but less real-time capture capability.
AI-Driven Workflows	AI test-case generation, BDD scenario creation, prioritization, and insights.	AI-based test value scoring, but no generation or BDD support.
Reporting & Dashboards	BI-friendly OData feeds and internal dashboards.	Highly customizable, user-friendly dashboards that are shareable and embeddable.
Available on AWS Marketplace?	✅ Yes, enabling streamlined procurement and deployment.	❌ No
Deployment Options	Cloud and on-premises with selectable global regions (USA, EU, CA, IN, SG, AU).	Cloud hosting
Scalability	Enterprise-ready with on-prem support and powerful automation capabilities.	Scalable SaaS with higher-tier plans suitable for larger, evolving organizations.
Usability	Feature-rich, with some learning curve as a result of deep capabilities.	Intuitive UI, but may also initially feel complex due to depth.
ROI	Concurrent licensing and integrated automation drive faster ROI.	Flexible pricing helps teams optimize resource use, but higher prices can result in slower ROI.
TrustRadius Product Rating	8.0 / 10	8.0 / 10
G2 Product Rating	4.3 / 5	4.3 / 5
Gartner Product Rating	4.0 / 5	4.0 / 5
Capterra Product Rating	4.0 / 5	4.9 / 5 (but with 9x fewer reviews)
Ideal User	Organizations needing on-prem/regional deployment, generative AI, deep automation, and BI-driven reporting.	Organizations prioritizing SaaS simplicity, highly customizable workflows, and broad sharing.
Licensing Model	Concurrent‑user (pay for the number of concurrent seats; i.e. more than 10 users can share 10 seats working at different times).	Named‑user pricing (you still pay for users who don’t log in often).
Estimated Monthly Price (10 users)	$380 (or $341.99 per month if billed annually)	$520 for basic Team Plan (this doesn’t include features from the Corporate Plan like SSO, multiple account owners, customer success, onboarding training, advanced Jira integration, advanced API capabilities, and more)

Key Advantages of SpiraTest

Complete Test Management: Natively supports manual, automated, and exploratory testing compared to PractiTest’s focus on manual workflows via external integrations.

Automatic Test Case Generation: Creates detailed test steps with sample data from simple requirements.

BDD Scenario Creation: Automatically generates Gherkin-based BDD scenarios for behavior-driven development.

Generative AI-Driven Efficiency: Automates test case creation, defect insights, and reporting, while PractiTest’s AI capabilities focus more on basic tasks like duplicate detection.

Comprehensive Release Management: Includes dedicated Release and Requirements modules for better traceability of requirements, defects, and results.

Flexibly Deployment: SpiraTest can be self-hosted (including air-gapped environments) or as a cloud product for regulated industries.

Compliance Ready: Features security capabilities like electronic signatures and SSO to support regulatory requirements.

Enterprise Scalability: Customizable workflows, dashboards, and integrations ensure scalability.

Enterprise BI via OData: OData feed designed for direct consumption by Power BI/Tableau for more scalable live analytics than PractiTest’s REST API, which leads to pagination limits.

Key Advantages of PractiTest

Cloud-First Design: PractiTest’s SaaS architecture is focused on cloud-hosted simplicity, which is appealing for fast-moving teams.

Shareable Dashboards Without Login: You can publish live dashboards externally for public stakeholders to view, which can be handy for broad visibility without provisioning users.

Built-In Task Boards: While SpiraTeam and SpiraPlan include Kanban/Scrum boards, PractiTest provides these in its base test management solution.

Filter-First Information Model: Workflows are organized around cross-module filters (instead of classic foldering) that some teams find faster for larger datasets.

Detailed Testing Efficiency Comparison: SpiraTest vs. PractiTest

1. Requirements Management

Feature	SpiraTest	PractiTest
Requirements Capture	Centralized requirements management with full traceability to test cases and defects.	Links requirements to tests but lacks advanced planning capabilities.
Behavior-Driven Development (BDD)	Built-in Gherkin syntax highlighting and automatic generation of Feature files for agile workflows.	Manual creation of BDD scenarios; no automation support.
Document Collaboration	Web-based document management with folder organization, version control, and tagging.	Basic document storage without advanced collaboration tools.

Advantage: SpiraTest ensures that requirements, test cases, and results are seamlessly connected, providing full traceability for agile, waterfall, or hybrid methodologies. Its BDD support enables streamlined behavior-driven development, while document collaboration tools ensure easy version tracking and team alignment.

Above Image: The SpiraTest requirements page, showing test coverage information.

2. Test Case Management and Execution

Feature	SpiraTest	PractiTest
Test Case Management	Supports workflows, test coverage tracking, data-driven testing, and test configurations.	Centralized test repository with reusable steps.
Test Steps	Supports manual and automated test steps, reusable components, and parameterized data.	Basic manual test steps with limited reuse.
Linked Test Steps	Allows linking of modular test cases, reducing duplication and improving maintainability.	Limited modular linking capabilities.
Manual Testing	Test execution wizard with real-time step tracking, defect logging, and traceability.	Strong manual test execution with test sets.
Automated Testing	Integrates with tools like Selenium, Rapise, UFT, TestComplete, and Ranorex for unified workflows.	Requires manual integration with external tools.
Exploratory Testing	Dedicated mode allows real-time test creation, editing, and defect logging. Includes free SpiraCapture app for session-based test capture and browser tracking.	Lacks tools for real-time exploratory testing.
Scalability	Handles large-scale enterprise projects with ease.	Suitable for smaller agile teams.

Advantage: SpiraTest’s parameterized and reusable test steps save time and effort, enabling complex and scalable test case management, while SpiraTest’s AI-powered test management ensures teams can focus on strategic testing, not repetitive tasks. PractiTest’s manual workflows create bottlenecks for agile teams, slowing down delivery cycles and increasing maintenance overhead.

See how SpiraTest can save up to 40% of your testing time! Start Your Free Trial now!

3. AI-Driven Testing

Feature	SpiraTest	PractiTest
Automation Tools	Integrates with Selenium, Jenkins, UFT, NUnit, and other frameworks.	Supports limited integrations with REST API.
AI Test Case Generation	AI generates test cases and steps from requirements, automating the test creation process.	Smart Fox AI adjusts test steps but does not automate test generation.
BDD Support	AI-based generation of Gherkin syntax BDD scenarios for behavior-driven development.	No BDD generation.
AI-Driven Prioritization	AI insights identify defects, gaps, and risks for actionable test improvement.	Test Value Score AI prioritizes test execution based on impact.

Advantage: SpiraTest’s AI eliminates repetitive tasks, accelerates test creation, and simplifies BDD adoption, making it the ideal solution for agile teams seeking efficiency and innovation. PractiTest’s reliance on external tools and manual configurations slows down automation workflows.

Above Image: The SpiraTest scenario editor, with integrated BDD Gherkin syntax highlighting.

Above Image: PractiTests’s prioritized execution using Test Value Score AI to measure each test case’s impact on the testing process.

4. Release and Build Management

Feature	SpiraTest	PractiTest
Release Management	Plan, manage, and monitor releases with features, requirements, and defects tracked by version.	Provides basic tracking but lacks detailed test case management for releases.
Test Results by Release	View executed test runs, segment results by operating systems or platforms, and monitor stability.	Test execution tracking is limited per release.
Build Management	Integrates with CI tools like Jenkins, GitHub, and GitLab to connect builds with testing results.	Limited CI integrations; relies on external plugins.

Advantage: With integrated release management and CI tools, SpiraTest connects testing to development workflows seamlessly. PractiTest lacks this level of integration, creating gaps for larger teams.

Above Image: SpiraTest allows you to easily manage the schedule and scope of releases and versions of the software being developed and tested.

5. Incident and Defect Management

Feature	SpiraTest	PractiTest
Bug Tracking	Full-fledged defect tracking is integrated into the test case lifecycle.	Basic built-in defect tracking.
Incident Cloning	Allows cloning defects with fields, attachments, and associations.	Limited cloning capabilities.
Traceability	End-to-end traceability linking defects to requirements and test runs.	Limited traceability to test cases only.
Reporting and Charts	Configurable incident grids and dynamic donut charts for open/closed statuses and priority.	Simplified incident charts.

Advantage: Traceability and defect resolution are critical for QA success. SpiraTest offers advanced defect tracking and traceability, giving teams a detailed analysis of testing and defect trends. PractiTest falls short in offering robust traceability features, leaving gaps between test cases, requirements, and defects.

6. Compliance and Customization

Feature	SpiraTest	PractiTest
Electronic Signatures	Built-in digital signature support for regulated industries like healthcare and finance.	Not supported.
Single Sign-On (SSO)	Integrated SSO for enterprise authentication at no additional cost.	Only supports SAML 2.0 SSO on more expensive Corporate Plan.
Customization	Configure workflows, notifications, fields, and test properties without coding.	Custom fields and workflows are available but limited.
Grid Customization	Flexible grid views for test cases, defects, and execution status.	Limited grid customization.
Notifications & Email	Real-time notifications with email-based incident tracking and commenting.	Provides notifications but lacks integrated email workflows.

Advantage: SpiraTest ensures compliance with features like electronic signatures and secure SSO access while offering extensive configuration options to adapt the platform to your team’s unique processes.

Above Image: The SpiraTest electronic signature page.

7. Reporting and Analytics

Feature	SpiraTest	PractiTest
Custom Reporting	XML-based customizable reports, traceability matrices, and interactive dashboards.	Provides standard pre-built dashboards with limited flexibility.
Insights	Reports that identify defects and test coverage gaps for proactive decision-making.	Test Value Score AI helps prioritize test cases.
Visualization Tools	Interactive charts, trend analysis, and reporting by release, sprint, or phase.	Simple dashboards with real-time updates.

Advantage: Effective reporting is crucial for decision-making and identifying areas for improvement. SpiraTest’s robust reporting and interactive dashboards empower teams to make informed decisions, identify issues proactively, and continuously improve testing efficiency. PractiTest’s reporting capabilities lack the advanced analytics required to optimize QA processes.

Above Image: The SpiraTest reporting dashboard that supports both standard and custom reports.

8. Seamless AI Integrations and Deployment Flexibility

Modern organizations need tools that integrate with their existing ecosystems. SpiraTest excels with its flexibility and support for leading AI platforms. It introduces intelligent automation to reduce the manual burden of test scripting and improve test reusability, ensuring scalability for growing teams.

Feature	SpiraTest	PractiTest
AI Platform Integrations	Supports OpenAI GPT, AWS Bedrock, Claude, Llama, and Azure OpenAI, delivering cutting-edge AI solutions.	No AI platform support, limiting advanced capabilities.
Deployment Flexibility	Offers cloud, on-premise, and hybrid deployments, ensuring security, compliance, and scalability.	Primarily cloud-based.

Advantage: Modern organizations need tools that integrate with their existing ecosystems. SpiraTest excels with its flexibility and support for leading AI platforms. SpiraTest’s flexible deployment and integration options allow organizations to harness AI securely while seamlessly fitting into their workflows, whether in the cloud or on-premise. PractiTest’s deployment restrictions can create security and compliance challenges for enterprises.

Cost-Benefit Analysis: SpiraTest vs. PractiTest

When evaluating software solutions, cost-effectiveness and value are critical.

Metric	SpiraTest	PractiTest
Pricing Model	Affordable concurrent user licensing (pay only for active users).	Per-user model (cost increases with team size).
Cloud-Based Cost	$34.20/user/month (decreases with scale).	Starts at $49/user/month (decreases with scale).
On-Premise Cost	$368.40/user/year.	Not available (SaaS-only offering).
Feature-to-Cost Ratio	High-value features for the price.	Limited AI and automation for a higher price.
Scalability	Cost-effective and scales well for growing teams.	Becomes expensive as the team size increases.

Why It Matters: SpiraTest’s flexible pricing and concurrent licensing model make it a more affordable and scalable option for teams of all sizes, compared to PractiTest's rigid per-user pricing.

Real-World Case Study of SpiraTest

Oney Bank adopted SpiraTest to enhance test management efficiency. The results:

Business: Streamlined QA processes, standardized workflows, and introduced automated QA metrics.

Technology: Replaced obsolete tools, consolidated teams on one platform, and improved productivity using advanced features.

Impact: Improved efficiency for 200 projects and 240 users and achieved significant time, cost, and productivity savings.

“SpiraTest…is the best tool in terms of quality and value compared to the other competing programs available on the market.. the time, productivity and cost savings are transparent…”

Benjamin-Michel G., Technical Test Analyst and SpiraTest Administrator, Omey Bank, France.

Talk to Our Experts: Learn how SpiraTest can optimize your test management processes and deliver measurable ROI.

SpiraTest vs. PractiTest: Which Should You Choose for Software Testing?

While PractiTest offers strong manual test management, centralized tracking, and basic AI features, it falls short in key areas like automated testing, exploratory testing, release management, and compliance. PractiTest is strong for agile test management and small QA teams, but its higher per-user cost can make it expensive and inefficient for growing organizations.

SpiraTest provides better value with its AI-driven automation, flexible licensing, and robust deployment options (cloud and on-premise). By eliminating manual inefficiencies, automating workflows, and delivering actionable insights, SpiraTest empowers teams to deliver higher-quality software faster and more cost-effectively.

Migrating from PractiTest to SpiraTest is Easy

Moving from one test management solution to another can often be a hassle — but our Migration Tool makes this a breeze. You can quickly import Users, Test Cases, Test Sets, Test Runs, Issues, Requirements, and Attachments from PractiTest into SpiraTest. Learn more about this tool and the process here.

Ready to bring AI into your test management and QA processes? SpiraTest is the future of efficient, scalable, and intelligent test management.